No made-up accuracy number
We don't quote an accuracy figure until real, user-reported PSA results back it — not a marketing-only "95% accuracy" claim with nothing behind it.
We started SnapGrade after one too many PSA submissions came back as 7s. The math wasn't working — and there was no honest tool to predict what PSA would say.
We don't quote an accuracy figure until real, user-reported PSA results back it — not a marketing-only "95% accuracy" claim with nothing behind it.
Credit-based pricing because card grading isn't a monthly subscription-shaped problem. Credits never expire — buy in 2024, use in 2030.
If the photos don't let the AI assess at least two of the four axes, the credit refunds automatically. We don't sell guesses.
The original team is three collectors and one machine-learning engineer. Between us we've submitted to PSA, BGS, CGC and SGC; we've been delighted by gem 10s and burned by surprise 7s; we've sold on eBay, Whatnot, Goldin and Discord auctions.
In 2023, after a particularly painful $1,200 PSA submission that came back averaging PSA 8 across the board, we decided to build the tool we wished existed: an AI that could tell us, before we shipped, which cards were actually worth submitting.
Today SnapGrade has graded 16,000+ cards (November 2026), from $1 commons to six-figure vintage Charizards.
Next: collecting real PSA results from users so we can publish an accuracy figure we can back, plus expanded TCG coverage.
We're bootstrapped and intend to stay that way — no VC, no subscription pressure, no incentive to lock you in. Just a tool that pays for itself the first time it catches a 7.
Sign up free, 1 free credit, see if it earns a spot in your pre-submission workflow.